March 17, 2008
It was announced a couple of weeks ago that leading ISP’s were planning to use Phorm as a platform to serve up targeted adverts to ISP registrants. It’s been touted as a great way to provide more relevant ads to users and all the initial talk seemed like PR spin designed to mask any potential privacy issues.
Now at last the privacy issues are getting a good airing!
Personally I’m against my ISP using the data of my surfing habits for advertising purposes. I use my ISP for access to the internet, I do not expect them to share my data on surfing habits with anyone (unless asked to by the authorities…).
Other blogs are asking what the fuss is about this and comparing Phorm to behavioral targeting technologies in use on retail websites. I disagree with this completely as this is going to collect data at the ISP level and share it with any websites which serve adverts through Phorm, this makes it far more pervasive.
An interesting question has to be asked though; how does this differ to Google / Doubleclick? If Google starts to share behavioral search data with Doubleclicks ad serving platform isn’t that going to be similarly invasive to users privacy? Potentially; although at least we expect that from Google as an ad revenue based business…
Interestingly, the BBC has just published a story that states that the Foundation for Information Policy Research has claimed that Phorm could well be illegal. They believe Phorm contravenes the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA), which protects users from unlawful interception of information.
This has the potential to get very interesting and could open up other networks and ad serving technologies to scrutiny.
March 6, 2008
Looks like Google may get it’s way and finally secure the acquisition of DoubleClick.
Will be interesting to see how this is handled and exactly what Google does to integrate tools and workforce when (if) if goes through!
February 19, 2008
Google has come in for the year at £1.3B of ad revenue from the UK alone. Estimates say that the TV channel ITV1 will come in at around £1.32B plus some £100M in sponsorship.
This is still pretty awesome from Google and they should take the lead next year as mobile expands and advertising moves to other platforms (and if they ever get DoubleClick properly into the fold).
More from the Guardian.
February 12, 2008
Interestingly though, while Google grew by 40% year on year in Q4 that was down on their growth a year earlier. That made their market share slip by 0.5%, but they do still own over 23% of the market. Something to do with the coming saturation of search marketing perhaps?
IDC says a merged Microsoft-Yahoo would command 17% of the U.S. online ad market, so still not enough to topple Google from the top spot.
One wonders if the figures for Google include DoubleClick yet??
December 20, 2007
This just in…
That was quick! The FTC voted 4-1 in favour of the deal and concluded that the deal would not substantially lessen competition.
Well done Google! Look forward to seeing the first development come out of this partnership!
October 30, 2007
Google has now overtaken ITV1 as the biggest recipient of advertising revenue in the UK according to the Times.
It’s been coming for a while as Google have been raking in the pounds as they expand their advertising into other sectors and functions. Google are expected to overtake the whole of ITV plc by the end of 2008.
What would make this interesting is the Doubleclick deal. The deal has just been approved by the Australian competition regulator, a first step for Google to get the deal as a whole approved. Now it just remains for the U.S. and EU regulators to okay it. The addition of Doubleclick revenue to Google’s advertising coffers could make it one of the biggest recipients of ad revenue in the world!